While the glycemic index (GI) is a widely used tool for ranking foods based on their effect on blood sugar, it has several limitations that make it less practical in certain real-world scenarios. Understanding these limitations is crucial for interpreting its relevance to daily eating habits.
The GI is calculated based on the glycemic response to consuming 50 grams of carbohydrate from a specific food, compared to a reference food like glucose or white bread. While this standardization helps in comparing foods, it can create a bias, especially for foods that are typically consumed in smaller portions. For example, watermelon is considered a high-GI food, but you would need to eat nearly 5 cups of watermelon to consume 50 grams of carbohydrate—a much larger portion than most people would eat.
To address this, the concept of Glycemic Load (GL) was introduced. GL considers both the GI of a food, and the amount of carbohydrate typically consumed in a serving. It is calculated using the formula:
For example, a serving of watermelon (5.5 grams of carbohydrate) has a GL of:
(72 x 5.5) ÷ 100 = 4
This adjustment shows that while watermelon has a high GI, its GL is low, making it less impactful on blood sugar when eaten in realistic portions. Using GL can sometimes completely change the ranking of foods. For instance:
However, foods like bagels and bananas see little change between their GI and GL rankings.
The stage of ripeness or maturity of a food can also significantly influence its GI. As fruits ripen, their starch content is converted into sugars, which lowers their GI. For example, a green, unripe banana has a higher GI than a fully ripened banana (Englyst & Cummings, 1986). Similarly, research suggests that “new potatoes” (younger, freshly harvested potatoes) tend to have a lower GI compared to older, matured potatoes (Soh and Brand-Miller, 1999).
Although GL offers a more practical way of understanding blood sugar impact based on typical serving sizes, its validity has been debated. Studies have shown that foods with the same GL can produce significantly different blood sugar responses.
These findings suggest that GL, like GI, is not always a reliable predictor of how a food will impact blood sugar. Moreover, it’s important to note that GL is not a measured value but a mathematical estimate, which further questions its real-world applicability.
Another limitation of GI is that it doesn’t account for the overall nutrient quality of a food. Nutrient density refers to the amount of vitamins, minerals, and other beneficial nutrients a food provides relative to its calorie content. Many foods with a high GI are actually nutrient-dense and provide essential nutrients, such as:
On the other hand, many low-GI foods, such as chocolate, ice cream, croissants, and cookies, are calorie-dense but lack essential nutrients. This discrepancy means that focusing solely on GI could lead people to avoid nutritious foods and instead choose less healthy options based solely on their GI ranking.
The GI and GL can provide useful insights into how foods impact blood sugar, but they are far from perfect tools. Key limitations include:
Ultimately, while GI and GL can be helpful for understanding carbohydrate quality, they should be used alongside other measures, such as nutrient density and portion control, to create a balanced and healthful diet.
At Food Research Lab, we specialize in providing comprehensive Glycemic Index (GI) testing services that empower food and beverage manufacturers to validate their product’s impact on blood sugar. Our testing follows internationally recognized protocols and is conducted at our ISO-certified clinical research facility, ensuring accuracy, reliability, and global compliance.
Food Research Lab strives for excellence in new Food, Beverage and Nutraceutical Product Research and Development by offering cutting edge scientific analysis and expertise.
