One of the major criticisms of the glycemic index (GI) is that it doesn’t account for how the addition of other macronutrients, like protein and fat, impacts blood sugar responses. GI was originally designed to measure the effect of carbohydrate-rich foods on blood sugar levels when consumed alone. However, in real life, people rarely eat carbohydrates in isolation; meals often contain a mix of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, which can significantly alter the GI. One of the major criticisms of the glycemic index (GI) is that it doesn’t account for how the addition of other macronutrients, like protein and fat, impacts blood sugar responses. GI was originally designed to measure the effect of carbohydrate-rich foods on blood sugar levels when consumed alone. However, in real life, people rarely eat carbohydrates in isolation; meals often contain a mix of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, which can significantly alter the GI.
When protein or fat is added to a carbohydrate-rich food, the GI of that food often decreases. However, the predicted GI from food tables doesn’t always match the actual GI of mixed meals. For example, a study by Flint et al. (2004) found that the GI of breakfast meals containing 50 grams of carbohydrates varied significantly depending on the amount of protein, fat, and overall calories in the meal. Their research showed that the GI of mixed meals was influenced more by fat and protein content than by carbohydrates alone.
Critics of these studies argue that differences in methodology, such as using total blood sugar responses instead of incremental values, may have skewed results. Despite these debates, it’s clear that mixed meals don’t follow the same predictable GI patterns as single carbohydrate foods.
To get an accurate GI for a mixed meal, you’d need to carefully balance the amount of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats to mimic laboratory conditions. However, this is not practical for everyday eating. People don’t usually weigh and measure their food components to ensure the predicted GI matches the actual outcome. Moreover, while adding fat or protein to a meal can reduce its GI, it also increases the calorie content, which may not be beneficial in an obesity-conscious society. For example:
In a world where obesity and calorie intake are major concerns, lowering GI at the expense of increasing calories might not be a wise strategy.
The stage of ripeness or maturity of a food can also significantly influence its GI. As fruits ripen, their starch content is converted into sugars, which lowers their GI. For example, a green, unripe banana has a higher GI than a fully ripened banana (Englyst & Cummings, 1986). Similarly, research suggests that “new potatoes” (younger, freshly harvested potatoes) tend to have a lower GI compared to older, matured potatoes (Soh and Brand-Miller, 1999).
While adding protein and fat to a meal lowers its GI, it can increase insulin secretion. For example:
This disconnect between GI and insulin response suggests that GI alone may not provide a full picture of a food’s metabolic impact, especially when macronutrients are combined.
Fiber is often thought to reduce GI, but its effect is more complex. Early research by Jenkins et al. (1981) suggested that soluble fiber (found in foods like oats and legumes) lowers GI, while insoluble fiber (found in whole grains and vegetables) has little impact. However, later studies, such as Wolever’s work in 1990, found the opposite. Wolever’s research on 25 foods showed that insoluble fiber was more strongly correlated with lower GI than soluble fiber. Even so, fiber content alone could only explain about 50% of the variability in GI.
Looking at international GI tables (Foster-Powell, 2002), the differences in GI between high-fiber and low-fiber foods are often minimal. For example:
While fiber might not dramatically lower GI, its health benefits are well-documented, including improving digestion and reducing the risk of chronic diseases. Choosing high-fiber foods is still a smart choice, regardless of their GI.
In summary, GI is not a perfect tool for assessing how real-world meals affect blood sugar. Factors like the addition of protein, fat, and fiber, as well as calorie content, can significantly alter GI and its predictive value. For a more holistic approach to diet, it’s important to consider not just GI, but also the overall nutrient composition and calorie content of meals.
At Food Research Lab, we specialize in providing comprehensive Glycemic Index (GI) testing services that empower food and beverage manufacturers to validate their product’s impact on blood sugar. Our testing follows internationally recognized protocols and is conducted at our ISO-certified clinical research facility, ensuring accuracy, reliability, and global compliance.
Food Research Lab strives for excellence in new Food, Beverage and Nutraceutical Product Research and Development by offering cutting edge scientific analysis and expertise.
